Friday, October 06, 2006

Awards For September 2006 Test For M. A. II, Social and Cultural History of India 1757 to 1947, Paper IV


The Awards List for the 27 students who had appeared in the September Test, 2006, for Paper II, Social and Cultural History of India 1757 to 1947 of M. A. II is given below.

The answer sheets will be shown for verification on October 09, 2006 in Room no. 8, Period 7.
Sr. noName Roll no.Marks
1Narinder Singh Dhaliwal200125
2Manjeet Kaur Bhullar20023
3Harneet Singh Kochar200435
4Vishal Sharma200533
5Amit Sharma200633
6Dharamjit Singh Gill20072
7Sukhjinder Singh Garewal20093
8Ramandeep Kaur Cheema201020
9Raj Kumar Sharma201115
102013Zero
11Upinder Singh201418
12Baldev Raj201511
13Bakhshish Singh Duggal201818
14Gursharan Singh Sekhon20208
15Narinder Singh Dhaliwal202118
16Lakhbir Singh Gill202329
17Gurpreet Singh Gill202434
18Gurteej Singh202520
19Ranjit Singh Rai202617
20Appar Singh Pannu202827+2=29
2120293
22Harnish2031Zero
23Gurdeep Singh2032Zero
24Gurpreet Singh Randhawa20332
25203414
26203513
2720371

Edit Report:
Serial no. 20, Roll no. 2028, Name Appar Singh, the marks has been increased by 2 and now the total stands at 29 after verification of the answers. Date: 09-10-2006

Thursday, October 05, 2006

Awards For September 2006 Test For M. A. I, The USA Paper III

The Awards List for the 37 students who had appeared in the September Test, 2006, for Paper III, The USA, 1864 – 1973 is given below.

The answer sheets will be shown for verification on October 09, 2006 in Room no. 9, Period 4.


Special Note: Two students bearing Roll no 1760 and 1761 have never attended the class but appeared in the Examination.

Sr. noNameRoll noMarks Obtained

1

Sukhbir Singh Garewal

1703

11

2

Maninder Singh Khangura

1704

11

3

Amandeep Singh Aulakh

1705

01

4

Dharampal Singh

1708

01

5

Bhupinder Jeet Singh Mangat

1709

zero

6

1710

zero

7

Kuldeep Singh Panjeta

1712

03

8

Harpreet Singh Garewal

1714

04

9

Paramjeet Singh Sidhu

1718

13

10

Didar Singh

1719

01

11

Devinder Singh Deol

1720

02

12

1722

zero

13

Satnam Singh Sandhu

1723

20

14

Manjeet Singh

1726

01

15

Amandeep Singh Gill

1727

01

16

Parminder

1728

zero

17

Inderveer Singh

1729

02

18

Nirmal Singh

1730

01

19

Avtar Singh Sekhon

1732

07

20

Iqbaljit Singh

1733

16

21

Beant Kaur Garewal

1734

22

22

Rupinder Kaur Garewal

1735

20

23

Harjaab Singh Dhaliwal

1736

04

24

1742

01

25

Devinderpal Singh

1743

06

26

Yadvinder Singh Garewal

1745

12

27

Hardeep Singh Dhaliwal

1747

04

28

Jagdev Singh Uppal

1748

04

29

Gurdeep Singh Sekhon

1749

20

30

Sukhpreet Singh Bhullar

1750

zero

31

Rinku Bains

1751

16

32

1752

zero

33

Sukhdeep Singh

1753

04

34

1757

03

35

Amardeep Singh Bhuttar

1758

02

36

1760

11

37

1761

1

Friday, September 29, 2006

Lecture Statement M A II The Social & Cultural History of India 1757 to 1947

Given below is the lecture statement ending on September 19, 2006 for the class M A II Paper The Social & Cultural History of India 1757 to 1947 held in Room no 8 in period 6 It is for the session 2006-2007

Total Lectures delivered were 17 The required minimum lectures were 75% of the total Delivered The minimum lectures required were taken equivalent to 12 Those who have attended less than 12 lectures are having deficiency of lectures.

Sr noName Roll NoTotal Attended
1Narinder Singh Dhaliwal200117
2Manjeet Kaur Bhullar200217
3Pawandeep Kaur Kang200317
4Harneet Singh Kochar200417
5Vishal Sharma200517
6Amit Sharma200617
7Dharamjit Singh Gill200717
8Manpreet Kaur Bhullar200817
9Sukhjinder Singh Garewal20097
10Ramandeep Kaur Cheema201017
11Raj Kumar Sharma201117
12Gurpreet Kaur Hansra201212
132013
14Upinder Singh201414
15Baldev Raj201517
162016
17Sandeep Singh Mann20177
18Bakhshish Singh Duggal201815
192019
20Gursharan Singh Sekhon202015
21Narinder Shingh Dhaliwal202115
22Rakesh Jain20227
23Lakhbir Singh Gill202314
24Gurpreet Singh Gill202415
25Gurteej Singh20257
26Ranjit Singh Rai202610
272027
28Appar Singh Pannu202814
292029
30Rajeev20307
31Harnish20319
32Gurdeep Singh 20323
33Gurpreet Singh Randhawa203310
342034
352035
36Harpreet Kaur Panjeta20367
372037
38Gurpreet Singh20382
392039
40Gurpratap Singh Mann20403

Edit Report: Correction in minimum lectures required. dated October 9, 2006.

Thursday, September 28, 2006

Lecture Statement M. A. I. The USA

Given below is the lecture statement ending on September 19, 2006 for the class M. A. I Paper The USA held in Room no. 9 in period 4. It is for the session 2006-2007.

Total Lectures delivered were 25. The required minimum lectures were 75% of the total Delivered. The minimum lectures required were taken equivalent to 18. Those who have attended less than 18 lectures are having deficiency of lectures.


Sr. noName Roll noTotal attendedRemarks
1Amarpreet Singh Gill17018
2Navdeep Singh Gill170214
3Sukhbir Singh Garewal170320
4Maninder Singh Khangura170420
5Amandeep Singh Aulakh170517
617060
717070
8Dharampal Singh17081
9Bhupinder Jeet Singh Mangat17094
1017100
11Ranveer Singh Gill 17111
12Kuldeep Singh Panjeta171215
13Sukhbir Singh 171318
14Harpreet Singh Garewal171411
151715
16Manpreet Singh Gill171614
171717
18Paramjeet Singh Sidhu171820
19Didar Singh17197
20Devinder Singh Deol172017
211721
221722
23Satnam Singh Sandhu172319
24Dinesh Kumar Verma172418
251725
26Manjeet Singh17261
27Amandeep Singh Gill172719
28Parminder17285
29Inderveer Singh17295
30Nirmal Singh173025
31Pawandeep Kaur Cheema173117
32Avtar Singh Sekhon173221
33Iqbaljit Singh17337
34Beant Kaur Garewal173416
35Rupinder Kaur Garewal173516
36Harjaab Singh Dhaliwal17366
37Parminder Singh173716
38Harvinder Singh173816
391739
40Gurjeet Singh Khera174012
41Sukhbir Singh Thind174110
421742
43Devinderpal Singh174316
441744
45Yadvinder Singh Garewal174512
46Mawchel Singh Garewal17462
47Hardeep Singh Dhaliwal17477
48Jagdev Singh Uppal174811
49Gurdeep Singh Sekhon174917
50Sukhpreet Singh Bhullar175011
51Rinku Bains175119
521752
53Sukhdeep Singh17537
541754
551755
56Tarun Handa17569
571757
58Amardeep Singh Bhuttar175814
59Harpreet Kaur Kainth17591Joined on 16-09-06

Saturday, May 06, 2006

Justifications and Causes for Secession on Eve of Civil War

The Convention of the delegates of South Carolina met at Columbia. It then shifted to Charleston. On December 20, 1860, by an ordinance, it dissolved the union between the state of South Carolina and other States united with her under the compact entitled “The Constitution of the United States of America.” (Reference: Documenting the American South)

The same convention on December 24, 1860 dissolved its union between South Carolina and other States of North America and simultaneously by words, declared it self as a nation among the nations of the world. The resolution to this effect was titled “Declaration of the Immediate Causes which induce and justify the Secession of South Carolina from the Federal Union”.


The following observations can be made on the contents of the resolution of December 24, 1860 which gave the justification and causes of the secession.

The Convention of delegates of South Carolina mentioned to her resolution of April 26, 1852 in beginning of the resolution.

It pointed out that therein, the Convention of South Carolina had observed that there was “frequent violations of the Constitution of the United States, by the Federal government.” Through those violations, the resolution of the South Carolina observed, that the Federal Government had made “encroachments upon the reserved rights of the States. It also emphasized that it was in the year 1852 itself, that the convention of the South Carolina had worked and thought on the line of secession from the union because of the violations of the Constitution of the United States by the Federal Government.

The convention of South Carolina observed with great concern that they had been showing the virtue of great forbearance but in face of frequent violations of the Constitution of Unites States America, the virtue had lost its appeal when faced with such breach of trust.

With the above mentioned forces at work, the convention of South Carolina declared that it had resumed her separate and equal place among the nations.

With that reality to live, the convention of South Carolina continued in the resolution to give words to the causes and elucidate the justifications in order to emphasize the causes that have led to that act.

The resolution first gave the justification of attaining the status of an independent state among the community of the independent nations. It emphasized that on July 4, 1776, when the thirteen colonies started the American resolutions, they stood as “free and Independent States” and they fought against the British rule with that status. Referring to that event, the resolution emphasized that the urge to undertake the revolution was guided by the basic principle which was, that when a “government becomes destructive of the ends for which it was established, it is the right of the people to alter or abolish it, and to institute a new government. It was under this principle, that the colonies at that time had broken their links with the British Empire.

It tried to remember in the resolution itself that it was for the security of the states on collective level that the independent states had come under the a league by writing the Articles of Confederation and the Congress of the United States had come into existence. The war was fought by that Congress and that Congress did not retain any power which was not entrusted to it and those powers remained with the states which had come together under that Congress.

On the basis of the above arguments, the South Carolina emphasized that at that time two principles were fully accepted and practiced. The first principle was that the state had the right of self government. It was first the constitution of the states, which came into existence and the constitution of the United States had come on a later date and rectified by the states working under their own constitution at that time. The second principle that was the cause of the birth of the new independent free and self governing states was that the people of the state had the right to abolish the government which becomes destructive of the ends of which it was instituted.

It emphatically pointed out that it was in 1787 that the states sent her deputies to revise the Articles of Confederation and the existing constitution of America came into existence only then.

The secession resolution of South Carolina had pointed out that the constitution which South Carolina accepted on May 23, 1788, was in nature a compact between the states. The South Carolina had joined the compact along with eight other states. Later two more states accepted the constitution. It was after along time that rest of the two states joined in.

The acceptance of the constitution equated to a compact in which the residual powers were with the states. These states had come into existence by a Declaration of Independence granting them the status of a sovereign state. It was so recognized by Great Britain on September 3, 1783.



The main argument which ran through the resolution was that the states were free and sovereign which was granted to them by the Declaration of Independence. Further, that any form of government when becomes destructive of the ends for which it was established, it is the right of the people to alter or abolish it and to institute a new government.

Thirdly that the acceptance of constitution by the state was similar to the compact wherein the residual powers remained safe with the constituent state.

The South Carolina convention of December 1860 evaluated the acceptance of constitution of America by South Carolina a compact. The convention also averred in the resolution that the performance of the material part of a compact is responsibility of each party that had joined in the compact. Any breach by any one party release the other party form the obligation of honouring the terms of the compact and thereby release the other party to exercise its own judgement to determine the fact of failure with all its consequences.

With the above rationale, the South Carolina convention declared that the federal government had breached the pact and pointed out by name fourteen such states which committed the breach.

The South Carolina convention asserted that the breach had taken place in respect of the fourth Article of the constitution of America. The fourth Article stipulated that “No person held to service or labour in one state, under the laws thereof, escaping into another, shall in consequence of any or regulation therein, be discharged from such service or labour, but shall be delivered up, on claim of th party to whom such service or labour may be due.”

The convention also placed on the record that Virginia joined the United States or in other words accepted the constitution when the article four was enshrined in the constitution. The convention also emphasized that it was the obligation of ‘General Government’ (Federal Government) as the common agent of the parties who had joined the compact to ensure the performance of the material part of the article. The Convention named the fourteen States that violated the spirit of the article four. The convention also accused the General Government of her failure to perform the material part of the article 4 in the role of a common agent.


The states which were accused of breaching were Maine, New Hampshire, Vermont, Massachusetts, Connecticut, Rhode Island, New York, Pennsylvania, Illinois, Indiana, Michigan, Wisconsin and Iowa. The convention finally asserted that “the constituted compact has been deliberately broken and disregarded by the non-slaveholding States, and the consequence follows that South Carolina is released from her obligation.”

The Convention accused that the fourteen non-slaveholder states had openly went against the article 4 of the Federal Government. The resolution gave specific case in case of some of them.


The convention also observed with great concern that by their acts, the fourteen non-slaveholding North States had tried to damage some of the established institutions of South States. They were encouraging open insurrection against Slave Holding “South States.

On the basis of above accusations, the resolution incorporated the conclusion that, “the constituted compacts has been deliberately broken and disregarded by the Non-Slave Holding States, and the consequences follows that South Carolina is released from her obligation.”


The Convention observed that Federal Government also failed to maintain the spirit of the compact on another front. According to South Carolina, that it was the basic goal of the constitution that through its material operation, it would “form a more perfect union, establish justice, insure domestic tranquility, provide for common defence, promote general welfare and secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity.”

The Convention observed that the Federal Government had failed in that goal which was enshrined in the constitution. It expressed its disapproval by putting it on records that “we affirm that these ends for which this Government was instituted have been defeated, and the Government itself has been made destructive of them by action of the non Slaveholding States.”

The resolution observed that the section of North State were “deciding upon the propriety of our (their) domestic institutions,” ‘denied the rights of property established in fifteen of the States’ that had been otherwise recognized by the constitution. The delegates of the convention observed that the North States had termed some of their established institutions which were recognised by the constitution, as sinful. They were destroying the institutions of South States by encouraging insurrection, by sending emissaries and by using books and pictures.


The Convention observed that the North States were knowingly denying their constitutional rights, destroying their established and recognized institutions and calling their institutions sinful for 25 years.

The Convention further observed that at that pint of the time that had openly “secrued to its aid the power of the Common Government.”

By making a final case in favour of the secession, the convention placed on record that, “a sectional party has found within that Article establishing the Executive Department, the means of subverting the Constitution itself.” Further, “A geographical line has been drawn across the Union….” The North States had united to elect a President of the United States, who had declared that “Government can not endure permanently half slave and half free.” The South Carolina thus expressed her stand and policy before the new president took oath of the office. The Convention also observed that it was a design of North States to subvert the Constitution by extending voting rights to such person who were incapable of becoming citizens. They had planned to use their votes to inaugurate a new policy hostile to South and destructive of its beliefs and safety.”


The Convention feared that afte 4th day of March next, the Federal Government will have become their enemy. The Federal Government, it was feared, would work on sectional lines.

The Convention observed that from then onwards, “erroneous religious beliefs” would work behind every policy decision.

The South Carolina finally wrote, “We, therefore, the People of South Carolina, by our delegates in Convention assembled, appealing to the Supreme Judge of the world for rectitude of our intentions, have solemnly declared that Union, heretofore, existing between this State and other States of North America is dissolved.”


Thus the South Carolina separated herself from the rest of the Unites States of America by separating herself from the compact and the other North States. After separation, it accorded a status to itself in the following words.
“The State of South Carolina resumed her position among the nations of the world, as a separate and independent States; with full power to levy war, conclude peace, contract alliances, establish commerce and to do all other acts and things which independent States may of right do.” It was signed and adopted on December 24, 1860.



Summary Observations:

These are the eight major observations on the justifications and causes of secession by South Carolina on the basis of the Convention which begun on December 17, 1860 and held at Columbia and then Charleston.

1. There was violation f the Constitution by the Federal Government. The Federal Government had made encroachments on the reserved rights of the States.
2. The Convention emphasized that the very existence of the Union was on the working of the pure truth that had established them ( 13 colonies in 1776) as “as free and independent states on July 4, 1776. They attained that status on the working and exercise of the truth which the convention states as follows:
“When a government becomes destructive of the ends for which it was established, it is the right of people to alter or abolish it and to institute a new government”
3. The Articles of Confederation and later the Constitution of United States of America had left the rights not specified in their body with the states and working of those rights could be carried out by the states with full freedom and independence.
4. The Constitution of United States of America which South Carolina accepted on May 23, 1788, was in nature a compact between the states. Under that compact, the residual powers were left with the States. The Federal Government under the constitution of United States America came up as a general agent and a general government for the Union and its constituting states.
5. The joining of any state in the union was in nature a compact. The working of the compact required that all parties honour their obligation and work for the working of the material part of the compact. Any breach by any one party release the other party from the obligation of honouring the terms of the compact and thereby release the other party to exercise its own judgement to determine the fact of failure with all its consequences. As and when it is established that the compact was breached, then South Carolina was free to determine its future course of after coming out of the compact from which it was released when other parties breached the compact.
6. South Carolina observed that the breach of the compact had taken place with respect o Article 4 of the Constitution of United States of America. The act of breaking the compact had been continuously carried out by 14 North States for last 25 years. The act of breach had been done by 14 non-slaveholding North States by attacking the domestic institutions of South States, by calling their institutions as sinful and failing to fulfill their obligation with respect to Article 4 of the Constitution of the United States of America.
7. The 14 non-slaveholding North States had also tried to raise insurrection in South States. The General Government had extended them her protection in their act of damage to South State and thus failed in aim for which it had been jointly raised. The aim of the General Government was “to form a more perfect union, establish justice, insure domestic tranquility, provide for common defence, promote general welfare and secure the blessings of liberty for ourselves and our posterity.” On the contrary, the General Government had extended protection to North States in raising insurrection in South States.
8. Finally, the resolution observed that a sectional party had come up which had united the North States for damaging the domestic institution s of South states. They had drawn a geographical line between north and south states. They were guided by “erroneous religious beliefs.” They wanted to extend the right of voting to such persons, who were incapable of becoming citizens and finally they had elected a President who asserted that “Government can not endure permanently half slaves and half free.” From March 4, 18612, all the acts of General Government would be carried on sectional lines guided by erroneous religious beliefs.

Hence, South Carolina, which had already dissolved its compact with the constitution, also dissolved the union with other states.


References and Sources:

For the text of resolutions of secession by various states on the eve of Civil War, refer to: University of Tennessee as Copied by Justin Sanders from J.A. May & J.R. Faunt, *South Carolina Secedes* (U. of S. Car. Pr, 1960), pp. 76-81

For the various ordinances in original refer to Documenting the American South

Sunday, January 01, 2006

Award List of M. A. I December 2005

Award List of M. A. I.
Paper: III, Opt. (i) The U. S. A. 1860 -1973,
held in December 2005, Arya College Ludhiana.

Serial No.Roll No.Marks
1170163
2170263
3170352
4170502
5170658
6170759
7170825
8170910
9171035
10171135
11171226
12171348
13171608
14171709
15171807
16171901
17172008
18172105
19172209
20172415
21172525
22172726
23172813
24172954
25173118
26173225
27173335
28173646
291737zero
30173850
31173935
32174045
33174152
34174215
35174301
36174625
37174704
38174825
39174936
40175037
41175125
421753zero
43175425
44175525
45175601
46175725
47175807
48175919
49176028
50176101
51176216
52176310
53176418
54176835
55176911
56177029
571772zero
58177302
59177435
60177526
61177651
62177750
63178018
64178135
65178242
66178455
67178504
68178725
69178819
70178950
71179029
72179235
73179525
74179740
75180019
76180320
77180504
78180713
79180801


Status: To be finalized after showing the answer sheets in the class room.
Editing Report:
  • Edited on March 21, 2006 whereby the marks of roll no 1702 has been shown as 63